By Fatima Rizvi
Mr Husain Haqqani has once again
targeted Pakistan. This time it was an extremely failed attempt at highlighting
some “facts” why Pakistan – China alliance and Chinese investment in Pakistan
is doomed to fail!
The
U.S. has shown little apprehension over China taking the lead in helping
Pakistan build critical infrastructure.
Mr Husain
Haqqani must realize that the US is not in a position to show any apprehensions
after suffering multiple wars in the region. Losses in terms of human lives and
trillions of dollars (US tax payers money) have wasted on a pointless war where
USA has failed to achieve any of their goals or objectives (If they had any in
the first place). China on the other hand, unlike USA, has absolutely no desire
to take over and control any foreign country. China seeks its own interests in
terms of economic and strategic gains without directly threatening or violating
any sovereign state. This is a major difference between US and Chinese
policies. Mr Haqqani seems to be toeing an old and outdated line which has lost
its attraction and fails to create an impact.
The
U.S. cannot inject billions of dollars into Pakistan, a difficult ally at the
best of times.
US can
definitely not inject billions of dollars into Pakistan indeed! Now that USA
has admitted its defeat in Afghanistan and is at the moment on a retreat trying
to find an honorable exit from the region, USA will definitely not want to invest
any more in Pakistan, an ally that was forced to join USA war against a
sovereign neighbor state. USA does not want long term relations with any
country (including India). For USA all allies are dispensable once they have
been used and abused. China on the other hand has stood by Pakistan whenever
there has been need for cooperation. Mr Haqqani needs to get is facts right
(that is if he wants to give the right facts to the world). What he has been
writing seems like a low level and low quality propaganda against Pakistan to
please the obvious entities who are his pay masters!
From
Washington’s perspective, it makes sense to let China help stabilize Pakistan’s
economy.
From
everyone’s perspective it makes sense to stabilize Pakistan’s economy which has
been extensively damaged by the two US wars in Afghanistan. Both the times USA
forced Pakistan to join the wars, provide logistical support and trained
mercenaries. USA encouraged drug and weapons culture in Pakistan during the
1980’s and promoted “madrasas” for recruiting Mujahideen to fight the soviets.
At that time there was no issue with religious militancy because it was
directed towards their cold war ear enemy, the Soviets. Pakistan has been supporting
millions of Afghan refugees from the first US – Soviet Afghan war. How USA’s
CIA utilized millions of dollars to buy support of Afghan warlords and at the
same time looked away when these “funds” were misused by the Pakistani
leadership also says something about US intentions and priorities. Mr Haqqani, if
he was not completely sold out “scholar”, could have mentioned such facts in at
least one of his many written master pieces! Pakistan’s economy suffered
another blow after 9/11 when Mr Bush called the then Pakistan military dictator
and “told” him to join the war against the Taliban. Instead of following the international
laws USA decided to bypass and violate all laws and attack a recognized
sovereign state. USA supported this military regime while it served their
purposes and restoration of democracy was never issue. USA may have given few
billion dollars to Pakistan during these “wars against terrorism” but the
damage USA has done to Pakistan’s economy, society and national institutions is
so great that even trillions of dollars would not be enough to fix it.
Thousands of Pakistanis (civilians and military) have lost their lives because
of US policies in this region.
The
Obama administration would also like China to induce Pakistan to abandon its
role as a terrorist safe haven.
Now Mr
Husain Haqqani really shouldn’t talk about terrorists and their supporter and
their creators. USA is the only country in the world which is responsible for
99% of all global terrorism. Because of USA’s violation of international laws
and abuse of human rights, terrorism has expanded to a global scale. USA has
drawn in countries which had no issues with the Muslim world or Islam. USA
created the Islamophobia by giving terrorism a religion. Before this a
terrorist was a terrorist and no religious community was ready to support or
own them. Today “with the grace of USA” terrorism is synonymous with Islam. All
Muslims are terrorists unless they are ready to serve USA (Congratulations Mr
Husain Haqqani you are not on US terror list). Pakistan was left to deal with
all the surplus Mujahideen crops which the CIA sowed in Pakistan for the first
Afghan war. Once the war was over Pakistan had to deal with these highly trained
fighters without jobs. There were no more US funds to keep paying these
brainwashed holy warriors of the Ronald Regan era. So what USA should have done
was taken all these recruits to USA with them and dealt with them however they
liked! Pakistan would have been a terror free nation if USA had not messed up
everything here.
China
has been concerned by Pakistan-based jihadists operating in Xinjiang and U.S.
officials hope Beijing can be successful in persuading Pakistan to clamp down
on the various Islamist groups operating from its soil.
I think
this is a very valid point. There has been a major mindset change in the
Pakistani society including military and civilian leadership. Probably Mr
Haqqani is not aware of this change as he seldom reads or writes anything positive
about Pakistan. Of course China has asked Pakistan to clamp down on terrorist
networks in Pakistan which might be involved in aiding militants outside Pakistan
especially in China. Pakistan military and civilian leadership have gone on an all
out offensive against terrorists and militant organizations. Unfortunately
USA’s policies in Pakistan only helped to propagate terrorists. Now that the
Pakistan Army and other national security agencies are in full control of anti-insurgency
and anti-terror operations, great progress and been made in a very short span
of time. USA has provided Pakistan with some military hardware for use against
terrorism but it seems that that too is pinching Mr Husain Haqqani and he even
wrote some articles and gave some talks against this. But then Mr Haqqani has
more than one supporter… how could he not render his services to India!
But
China’s economic reassurances could also reinforce Islamabad’s miscalculations
about its regional clout and dangerous ambitions of keeping India strategically
off-balance through subconventional means, including terrorism.
China it
seems is much wiser and mature in terms of its foreign policies compared to
USA’s cowboy approach. As for Pakistan, has no misconceptions about its
strategic regional importance. Pakistan is also fully aware of its current
economic situation and has been trying to build better relations with all its
neighbors. Pakistan wants to promote economic cooperation with India, Iran,
Afghanistan and China. Unfortunately India has failed to reciprocate Pakistan’s
gesture of friendship and continues to hold hostile and aggressive posture. Now
India, with their new found friendship with USA has become even more cocky. PM
Modi, who was few months back not allowed to enter USA, is now President
Obama’s BFF! So Mr Haqqani, please… give us a break!
Just
as Pakistan turned to the U.S. soon after independence in 1947 to seek weapons
and economic assistance against India, Pakistan’s leaders today see China as a supporter
in their bid to be India’s regional rival.
One would
have assumed that Mr Haqqani would be more informed than this but then what do
facts have to do with propaganda and why would a propaganda artist like Haqqani
want to waste his time with truth and logic.
Soon after
independence, Pakistan “had” to choose sides between the two great superpowers
of the era. Was it like a flip of a coin decision, probably not but India being
a natural soviet ally, Pakistan was “chosen” by USA as an ally. Pakistan was
projected by USA as a successful and most economically viable new country.
Great praise and honor was bestowed upon the leaders of Pakistan. USA provided
Pakistan with economic and military support. USA wanted to create a frontline
force to deal with Russia and its ally in the region. Pakistan was a new and
unstable state with leaders looking for foreign recognition and support. USA’s
mostly focused on military to military ties with Pakistan. This is evident from
how USA has never actually opposed military dictatorship in Pakistan but rather
used it for its own advantage.
Pakistan
has experienced more than its fair share of problems in the form of wars,
political crises, foreign policy misadventures, unbalanced alliances and
internal mismanagement. Today, things have changed. Pakistan is a wiser and a
more mature country. We continue to learn from our mistakes. China sees
Pakistan as an important ally but more than that China sees Pakistan as a
gateway to Arabian Sea access. It’s a combination that only a country like
China can appreciate and make full use of. But China also knows that to make
this work it must do all it can to stabilize Pakistan. Economic stability
through infrastructure development can greatly benefit the people of Pakistan,
especially in Balochistan. It’s a win-win situation for both allies.
The
U.S. disappointed Islamabad by refusing to back its military confrontations
with India even while selling Pakistan U.S. weapons (intended for other
purposes). Now it might be China’s turn to be the object of unrealistic Pakistani
expectations.
Pakistan
has never had unrealistic expectations Mr Haqqani, Pakistan today does not want
war with India or any other country in the world. We have enough problems of
our own thanks to the US interference in the region. Today Pakistan wants
security and economic stability to support and sustain its huge population of
over 200 million people, majority of whom are young adults. Pakistan can be an
investor’s paradise only if we can eliminate terrorism and overcome our energy
shortage. With China’s multi-billion investment in infrastructure projects in Pakistan,
there is great hope and achievable optimism.
By
supporting Pakistan militarily, China has ensured that a large part of India’s
military remains tied down in South Asia and is unable to challenge China in
the rest of Asia.
It is
India which considers China a threat. India is a paranoid state. It thinks
Pakistan and its ISI are trying to plot against India all the time. India is
the one initiating cross-border firing on the line of control between the two countries.
Why doesn’t Mr Haqqani see India purchasing weapons worth billions of dollars
from Russia and USA? Why does India need all this state of the art military
hardware if does not want to dominate the region. Pakistan like any self
respecting country would not like to be suppressed by a bully state, therefore
it must ensure its security by building alliances and keeping its military as well
equipped as possible. So by supporting Pakistan is not trying to make India do
anything, It is India which is feeling threatened that that its control over the
region may not remain supreme.
But
India remains the larger market and China’s willingness to use Pakistan as a
secondary deterrent against India hasn’t meant abandoning ties with New Delhi.
Chinese trade with India in 2013 was $65 billion, six times its trade with
Pakistan. In Pakistan’s 1965 and 1971 wars with India, China disappointed Pakistan
by not opening a second front against India.
Again Mr Haqqani’s obsession with conflict and
war makes his reasoning completely warped. China is not looking for wars (that
is USA’s hobby), China is trying to expand its economic interests and in doing
so transferring significantly huge benefits to its allies which fit in to its
economic growth and expansion plan. China should not only continue its trade
relations with India but also strive to make them even better.
China has
a right to its foreign policy and it chose to not open a second front against
India during Pakistan – India wars, then Pakistan must respect their decision
and Pakistan must have accepted China’s decision proof of which is that
Pakistan and China are still extremely strong allies.
None
of this has affected the Pakistani perception of China as an all-weather
friend. There is a huge gap in how Pakistanis view China and how the Chinese now
view Pakistan. According to a 2014 Pew Research Center Global Attitudes survey,
78% of Pakistanis had a favorable view of China compared to only 30% of Chinese
viewing Pakistan favorably—the same share of Chinese that had a favorable view
of India.
Mr Haqani
has very conveniently established that the majority of Chinese people do not
like Pakistanis by quoting few figures from a survey. Many more surveys can be
quoted proving otherwise. Additionally if Mr Haqqani’s logic is used on USA
would prove devastating for the US as majority of the people have an extremely
negative view of this crumbling superpower. Relations between countries are not
built on shoddy surveys performed under dubious circumstances to achieve
preconceived results. Relations are built between allies on mutual interest and
trust and then these relations enable people to people contact.
Pakistan
would benefit if all the billions in Chinese investment come through, but not
all previous announcements of Chinese largesse have materialized in Pakistan or
elsewhere. Despite announcing plans for more than $24 billion in investment
into Indonesia since 2005, a decade later China has invested only $1.8 billion
there.
China’s interest in building the economic
corridor through Pakistan has become almost an urgent matter for the Chinese.
They have already acquired the Gwadar Port in Balochistan on a forty years
lease. To fully benefit from this deal, China has to follow up on the Corridor
project on urgent basis. So Mr Haqqani has once again used out of context reasoning
based on obsolete logic.
Instead of exhausting itself in competing
with an Indian neighbor six times its size Pakistan needs to confront religious
extremism, eliminate terrorism and pursue economic reforms that they talk about
but do not implement.
Pakistan is not competing with its bigger
neighbor. India might be six times bigger than Pakistan in size but it has failed
to behave like a an emerging superpower. Its constant fear of what Pakistan
might do or who is becoming Pakistan’s ally is a proof that actually it is
India that is trying to compete with Pakistan. Pakistan want to benefit from
the Indian economy and market but it seems that India will never forget that
what was once the heart of India is now an independent and sovereign state.
As for fighting extremism is concerned,
Pakistan military and civilian leadership has resolved to completely eliminate
terrorism, National Action Plan specifically aims to do that. On the other hand
ever since Mr Modi has taken over the PM’s role in India, Hindu extremists
there have become extremely bold in targeting religious minorities. Hundreds of
forced conversions have taken place where Muslims and Christians have been
forced to convert to Hinduism. Some extremist Hindu leaders backed by leading
Indian political parties have even proposed to shut down all churches and
mosques in India and to place a Hindu god in every mosque and church.
No comments:
Post a Comment